Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by regulation." It can be properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

It also addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and one hundred twenty on the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outside traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a significant alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and successfully.

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it really is unclear how it relates to any presented situation, frequently rendering judgments based around the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances of the case at hand. This kind of decisions become a guide for upcoming similar cases.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, it is also a nicely-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant here rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.

The Cornell Law School website offers various information on legal topics, together with citation of case law, and in some cases presents a video tutorial on case citation.

The different roles of case legislation in civil and common legislation traditions create differences in how that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale guiding their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the broader legal principles.

17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have heard the discovered counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

The acquired Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced by the findings inside the Impugned order, after recording of evidence with the respective parties. Read more